Showing posts with label The Field. Show all posts
Showing posts with label The Field. Show all posts

Tuesday, November 4, 2014

Eating the Big Apple: Self Producing Work In NYC, By Emilyn Kowaleski

This piece is late, unforgivably overdue. What excuse can I give? My computer dropped onto the subway tracks? A piece of scenery dropped on my head? I was consumed in tunnel vision, tackling a recent production of my work? Or most honestly, I am a young artist, mastered in over-commitment, but admittedly, not yet mastered in time management. “There is never enough time!” I cry, shaking my fists melodramatically to the ceiling. I was underwater trying to solve the myriad of artistic challenges in front of me and the financial and logistical ones that accompanied them. However, the unforgivable irony of the matter is that The Field is a buoy that I've found and clung to for support in those arenas after I dropped myself into what felt like the ocean-like task of making and self-producing my own work in New York City.
I graduated from liberal arts school in New York, a few years ago, from a program I loved that taught me many things about making theater and that whole-heartedly encouraged me to go out and start creating work. But what I discovered when I graduated was that; I didn’t really know how to do that on a practical level. Outside of college, rehearsal space didn’t exist for sign up on the third floor in front of the production offices.  I didn’t get to attend a class anymore where people were forced to sit and look critically at my work. I didn’t know proper grant writing language, or how to get a residency, or really how to convince anyone that I, a bright ideaed, starry eyed, post-graduate deserved time, money and resources to create that work, especially when I am one of thousands. I had no track record in the big bad apple, so I just started biting in wherever I could.
            Two years past graduation, in hungry searching of finding the existing remnants of my cushy college life, and building patterned practices of producing work, I found The Field. There, behold: cheap rehearsal space to be connected with, fundraising workshops, and people to meet with every week who would watch and respond to my work. I started with the later. I signed up for Fieldwork, where I could again, play, try, fail and build in front of an audience who would tell me what they were seeing. I had just begun the first stage of development on a piece called Root of the Rosebush that is based on a series of interviews I had conducted with people about their history with relationships from first crush to present day. I didn’t know what that piece would be, or how to construct it really. I just wanted a place to experiment and a chance to know how my words and images were affecting others; I found that in Fieldwork.
 Six months later, after I had built that piece into a first draft and was looking to develop it further, both financially and artistically, I knocked again at the doors of The Field. I signed up for Jumpstart and another session of Fieldwork, back to back.
             For Jumpstart, I was delighted to turn up at American Table, met by the smiling but serious face of Fran Krimser. “Ok,” she said handing us a packet of information on budgets, networking and fundraising that set off palpitations in my idealistic artist heart that was childishly screaming “But why?! I just want to make things!” My adult brain knows, of course, that this is part of that work.  Thankfully, she made it easy. “I’m not going to spend three hours of your time talking at you generally without applying this to your project specifically.” She breezed us through the packets, took us through some exercises and let us practice how to talk about our work.  Then, she sent us on our way with the homework of creating a budget, a project description, and development and potential sponsor lists. A week later, I met with her individually to discuss how best to proceed with my project. She told me how I could make the timeline more manageable, where I could slash the budget and bit, by bit where I could raise the money I need. She articulated the marketable strengths of the work and advised me on an application to present a workshop production at Dixon Place, which, in thanks to her, I ended up receiving.  My heart palpitations have not gone away, still staring at the gigantic apple in front of me, but they have slowed.  It was as if someone had sat down and helped me cut that apple into manageable pieces that I could actually start to chew.

            Fieldwork, on the artistic flipside, operates in much the same way.  Every week, artists meet and present roughly ten minutes of work for feedback. By showing chunks of a larger piece that I was building, I was able to test flavors, and focus on fine-tuning particular moments as I wove them into a whole. Jumpstart was a process of learning how to market my work. It was all about finding the most captivating language with which to articulate what I was doing.  Fieldwork was a process of discovering what about my work itself was intriguing to an audience. Fieldwork is magical.  It a safe space for creative trials, with caring eyes to greet it with observations that fuel the work. It is easy for me to view Fieldwork as a delicious treasure, and Jumpstart as a necessary chore. However, what doing the two programs in tandem taught me, was that this all of it actually feeds same important skill set that is necessary to develop as an artist—Learning how to articulate descriptions of my work and make it in a way that engages people.


Wednesday, September 24, 2014

To fail and fail big: In Action: F*ck You Money (or how to build a Working Capital Fund)

In mid-May my partner and I adopted a beautiful newborn girl.  We named her Miranda.  I went on maternity leave the day she was born.  I was out for 3 months.  Sort of (e.g., I’m a control freak).
Six weeks of my 3 month maternity leave were paid by The Field.  2 weeks were vacation.  This means that for one month I wasn’t paid.  I have now come back to work ¾ time.  (My partner and I have some personal savings to support one month unpaid.  My partner works in tech and he also got paid parental leave.  We were both able to be with the baby for three months while working very intermittently and remotely.  Amazing.  Unheard of. We are privileged.)

How did The Field pay for my maternity leave?  In 2008, The Field strategically set aside unrestricted surplus money in a Working Capital Fund for “special initiatives, cash flow needs and financial challenges.”  We used it for the first time in 2013 when our first staff member went on maternity leave and we had to move offices.  We used it for the second time for my maternity leave.  Success! The Field has money to support staff leave!

Now how did we save that money in the first place? 1) We committed to saving. Every year, we included an expense line item in our budget for $2-$5k for our Working Capital Fund - right alongside traditional expenses like rent, salaries and paperclips.  And then we fundraised and earned income toward meeting this and all annual expenses.  We were transparent with all of our stakeholders and donors that we were doing this for our resilience, innovation and nimbleness.  No one questioned it. In fact, we were applauded for being “capitalized” unlike many of our peers who were undercapitalized.  2) We committed to ending every year with an unrestricted surplus  that we could then allocate to the Fund.  (How? We grew our earned income and unrestricted individual giving.) 3) We paid strong attention to our expenses.  We probably scrimped at times. (I wouldn’t necessarily do that again.  I would rather push income than scrimp.)

How can you do this in your life? At our “to fail and fail big” APAP session last January one of our guest speakers, Nature Theater of Oklahoma, told us that they always have a small pile of “f*ck you  money” so that their projects are not vulnerable to the vagaries of funders and producers.  You too, dear reader, should have a Working Capital Fund or f*ck you money for cash flow, medical needs, dream projects etc.  Don’t tell me you can’t.  Don’t tell me you are already hand to mouth. I know.  But even you, dear reader, can save a dollar a day.  Yes, you can.
So can a leader of a small non-profit really go on maternity leave?  Yes.
I have three Executive Director friends who are pregnant right now. They are all a bit nervous about maternity leave.   One of them also has a Board of Directors that is anxious about her leave (“what will happen without YOU?”).  The Field Board was incredibly supportive of my adoption plan and I gave them little to no reason to worry about my absence. 

Here’s what I learned on my maternity leave, some failures and some successes

1)      Give people an opportunity to lead (and then really let them lead): Instead of hiring an outside interim Executive Director I promoted two senior staff to “Interim Co-Executive Directors”.  They each brought different skills to the table and different energies.  The rest of our small staff and Board trusted them deeply. Success: They did a stellar job.  They became closer as colleagues.  They seemed to feel more empowered and invested in The Field.  Failure: see #3 below. 
2)      Check-in: I did weekly check-ins with my Co-EDs on any major projects or decisions to be made.  Success: They felt supported.  I felt connected and that I wouldn’t come back in 3 months to an unrecognizable situation, project or decision.
3)      I am a control freak:  This has definitely served me at times (i.e., success: I’ve gotten a lot done the way I want it done) but not for the long haul.  Failure: I worked more during my maternity leave than just weekly check-ins. I spent some time on a few grant reports and proposals that I just felt I had to do myself.  It wasn’t terrible for me (and my family) but I am sure it would have been fine if I had NOT worked on them.  Failure: the staff felt a tad confused (who is doing what? when?) and maybe less empowered.

So what’s the end result? I feel valued by an organization and a Board that supports me as a rounded human being with a growing family.  I feel like it’s possible to be an Executive Director and a Mom.  I leave work on time now.  I work 4 days a week.  I don’t work 80 hours a week.  I feel efficient and effective.  So far.  So good.


But I’ve been warned by Mom/artist friends to not talk about my baby.  “No one wants to hear it.  Everyone is working 80 hours a week for too little money. This is what we value.  Not family.”
Bullsh*t. I disagree.  I want it to be different. For me, for The Field, for others.  I’m working in my small ways to make it different.  At The Field at least and by being transparent, vulnerable and active in my work and in posts like these.

My question to you dear reader is: where do you want the arts to be different?  How do you want your life to be different? And what are you doing to make it different?

P.S.  I love the Artists Raising Kids compendium from Headlong!  Check it here http://static.squarespace.com/static/53767189e4b07d0c6bf4b775/t/5388abffe4b02f7f94909052/1401465855677/Artists%20Raising%20Kids%20Compendium.pdf

Thursday, April 14, 2011

Are you a hyperlemming?: Reflections on the ERPA: Next Gen Hypermedia Debate

You have to blog. You have to be on Twitter. You have to get friends on Facebook. Now.

No you don't. You are not a lemming. You have free will. Think about it and make strategic choices.

FIVE THINGS I LEARNED ABOUT HYPERMEDIA (or how not to be a lemming):

1. From the effervescent and salty-throated Matthew Heggem: hypermedia is not new! Just like so many things that "we" think "we" discovered. Hypermedia was coined in 1965 by Ted Nelson. 1965!!! Where were you in 1965? The real question is: what are we going to do with hypermedia now? The debaters pushed for conscious and strategic choices about blogging, tweeting, etc-ing. Who are you and why are you doing what you are doing? Is all that work impacting your goals? What are your goals? Think about it. Don't be a lemming.

2. From the articulate and sage Eva Yaa Asantewaa: “you can use the "I" without writing from the "I"”. Both Eva and Wendy Perron brought their years of writing experience to the debate. They encouraged (uh, demanded?) that young writers NOT use the first person when writing a review. It takes a rigor and a muscularity to write from the wider perspective. (And yet it seems most blog journalism is all about the I—as I am demonstrating here!)

3. From the assertive and sassy Brian McCormick: he is an early adapter (adopter?) of social media tools BECAUSE he is innately and organically a network kind of guy! He's a teacher. He likes to connect the dots. Social media is all about networks. So it works for him without struggle and pain. But many of his artists/clients are struggling because it isn't innate for them! So he has to work around that: even if the artist isn't into Facebook or Twitter etc., can they use these tools to their advantage? Does it help them achieve their goals? (Don't be a lemming part three!)

4. From the self-identified maximalist Sarah A.O. Rosner: creating a dance and writing her blog posts and Facebook updates and marketing her work is all the same decision-making process! It is all part of her choreographic and aesthetic development. (Wendy Perron and Ms. Rosner have had some heat on this matter in the past and it sizzled at Abrons!)

5. And from the cool and astute moderator, Kay Takeda (of the LMCC): strategy strategy strategy. She told me later that the paradigm is shifting for her! Hypermedia is shifting it! She didn't think it was! But it is!

Now, watch out for that cliff!

...But you saw that coming. You're not a lemming.